IT-Naturschutz/konova
7
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 6 Pull Requests 1 Actions Projects Releases 37 Wiki Activity

Biotope codelists #110

New Issue
Closed
opened 2022-02-07 11:17:29 +01:00 by mpeltriaux · 3 comments
mpeltriaux commented 2022-02-07 11:17:29 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Status quo

Currently we use 974 as regular biotope list. However, these list's metadata changed a while ago and it appears that this is not the total list of biotopes but rather the biotopes which are valid after_state biotope_types.

Instead there is 654, which defines all biotopes, that can be used for before_states.

Fix/Improve

Add 654 as another code list for before_state biotopes.

# Status quo Currently we use 974 as regular biotope list. However, these list's metadata changed a while ago and it appears that this is not the total list of biotopes but rather the biotopes which are valid `after_state` `biotope_types`. Instead there is 654, which defines all biotopes, that can be used for `before_states`. # Fix/Improve Add 654 as another code list for `before_state` biotopes.
mpeltriaux added the
bug
enhancement
 labels 2022-02-07 11:17:29 +01:00
mpeltriaux self-assigned this 2022-02-07 11:17:29 +01:00
mpeltriaux commented 2022-02-10 13:52:47 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

Needs to be discussed with responsible ministery people: Should we simply drop the usage of 974, since it has not been used pretty well on already entered data from the predecessor system. We might run into problems once we start migrating old data.

Needs to be discussed with responsible ministery people: Should we simply drop the usage of 974, since it has not been used pretty well on already entered data from the predecessor system. We might run into problems once we start migrating old data.
mpeltriaux added the
question
 label 2022-02-10 13:52:57 +01:00
mpeltriaux commented 2022-02-16 08:35:06 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

Update

Ministery says there should be no technical limitation for after_states biotopes. There could always be a special case, where a biotope needs to be selected, which would not be included in 974.

Therefore:

  1. Drop the usage of 974 completely and implement 654 for all biotopes
# Update Ministery says there should be no technical limitation for `after_states` biotopes. There could always be a special case, where a biotope needs to be selected, which would not be included in 974. Therefore: 1. Drop the usage of 974 completely and implement 654 for all biotopes
mpeltriaux commented 2022-02-16 09:10:45 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

Merged in #117

# Merged in #117
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
backlog
Absolutely no priority, but maybe some day...
bug
Something is not working
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
enhancement
Idea for existing feature
feature
New feature
help wanted
Need some help
invalid
Something is wrong
question
More information is needed
wontfix
This won't be fixed
bug
Something is not working
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
enhancement
New feature
help wanted
Need some help
in discussion
invalid
Something is wrong
MAUS - Pacht
Issues für Maus-Pacht / Version processware
priority
1
priority
2
priority
3
priority
4
priority
5
question
More information is needed
wontfix
This won't be fixed
No Label
bug
enhancement
question
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
btuelek jhaeder mmannfeld mmueller mpeltriaux sgorell srieder tnette
No Assignees mpeltriaux
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: IT-Naturschutz/konova#110
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?