EcoAccount funding #13
Labels
No Label
backlog
bug
duplicate
enhancement
feature
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
in discussion
invalid
priority
1
priority
2
priority
3
priority
4
priority
5
question
wontfix
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: IT-Naturschutz/konova#13
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Status quo
EcoAccounts aren't fully implemented, yet. This aspect is not implemented in any way.
Funding
EcoAccounts can be funded by different financiers projects (Aktion BLAU, ...). In most cases these fundings have no effect on the deduct capacity of an EcoAccount. The conservation office will be motivated to just pay 10% (or similar) for an EcoAccount, where 90% will be paid by the funding projects.
However there are rare cases where a 10% self payed EcoAccount will just provide 10% of the surface for deductions!
Implementation
EcoAccounts should always hold an attribute
deductable_surface
which holds the absolute surface in m² which can be deducted for an intervention. This way we have full flexibility for future changes in law, which can not be taken into for now. Furthermore it gives full control over deductable surfaces for users.Update:
These cases are not that rare. In fact only 10% of an eco account can be deducted, if only 10% have been paid and not been funded by other projects.
Merged in #22