Mapfiles preparation #179
Labels
No Label
backlog
bug
duplicate
enhancement
feature
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
in discussion
invalid
priority
1
priority
2
priority
3
priority
4
priority
5
question
wontfix
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: IT-Naturschutz/konova#179
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Status quo
All data aggregated by KSP need to be published using WMS and/or WFS on LANIS. For this, new mapfiles need to be created, which access the data stored on the database.
Mapfiles and views
The mapfiles are going to access prepared views on the database. These views will only be accessible for a certain user.
All views will return at least the following attributes:
identifier
,title
,geometry
,report_link
Where
identifier
refers to the previous "Kennung",title
holds the human readable title of the entry andgeometry
holds the geometry using the crs 25832 (default of RLP).view_eiv_recorded
Returns all recorded interventions ("EIV"). Color scheme should follow the already known color currently used in LANIS.
view_eiv_unrecorded
Returns all unrecorded interventions ("EIV"). As discussed with LanisZ, rendering those entries would be a huge improvement especially for architects out there during planing phase: They are not really interested on details of certain entries but rather in the placement of their surfaces. Showing these 'in-progress' surfaces helps avoidance of de-facto-used areas for new projects.
Color scheme for these entries must follow: Fill color similar to view_eiv_recorded but with a obvious red touch. No border color. Fill color must be displayed using a linear-gradient, to further highlight the in-progress state of these entries.
view_kom_recorded
Returns all compensation ("KOM") of recorded interventions. Color scheme should follow the already known color currently used in LANIS.
view_kom_unrecorded
Returns all compensations ("KOM") of unrecorded interventions. As discussed with LanisZ, rendering those entries would be a huge improvement especially for architects out there during planing phase: They are not really interested on details of certain entries but rather in the placement of their surfaces. Showing these 'in-progress' surfaces helps avoidance of de-facto-used areas for new projects.
Color scheme for these entries must follow: Fill color similar to view_kom_recorded but with a obvious red touch. No border color. Fill color must be displayed using a linear-gradient, to further highlight the in-progress state of these entries.
view_oek
Returns all recorded eco accounts ("OEK"). Color scheme should follow the already known color currently used in LANIS.
There is no need to provide another view for unrecorded eco accounts
view_ema
Returns all recorded ema entries ("EMA"). Color scheme should follow the already known color currently used in LANIS.
There is no need to provide another view for unrecorded eco accounts
Mapfiles have been created for dedicated service. Rendered data comes from konova.test.naturschutz.rlp.de staging server.