API code ID refactoring #285

New Issue

mpeltriaux · 2023-01-31T09:45:31+01:00

mpeltriaux commented

2023-01-31 09:45:31 +01:00

Status quo

THe API expects atom_id to be used for codes such as biotope, laws, offices and so on.

However, there are multiple codes in certain lists which do not have unique atomIDs. Therefore a clean reference resolving is impossible.

Enhancement

Instead the API should solely work on the correct technical unique ID of a code. This was not possible before due to inpersistent IDs on codes, which has been fixed in the meanwhile: SGD-Nord/oKey#1

# Status quo THe API expects `atom_id` to be used for codes such as biotope, laws, offices and so on. However, there are multiple codes in certain lists which do not have unique atomIDs. Therefore a clean reference resolving is impossible. # Enhancement Instead the API should solely work on the correct technical unique ID of a code. This was not possible before due to inpersistent IDs on codes, which has been fixed in the meanwhile: https://git.naturschutz.rlp.de/SGD-Nord/oKey/issues/1

mpeltriaux added the

enhancement

label 2023-01-31 09:45:31 +01:00

mpeltriaux self-assigned this 2023-01-31 09:45:31 +01:00

mpeltriaux referenced this issue from a commit

2023-02-01 08:13:04 +01:00

#285 Drop atom_id from API

mpeltriaux added reference 284_285_API_changes

2023-02-06 14:58:32 +01:00

mpeltriaux referenced this issue

2023-02-16 08:21:19 +01:00

284_285_API_changes #296